I am in a constant exercise of deconstructing something of the worst that my species has to offer: fascist thought.
By eliminating the nationalist, racist and speciesist approach (exalting the living and animal character of living beings susceptible to suffering, we intend to change the spotlight by subordinating the human individual to the terrestrial biosphere) and categorically and frontally rejecting the notion of a centralized government headed by a dictatorial leader (we will all be our own tyrants constantly self-monitoring and self-censoring thanks to a twist of our dystopian technology) is that we encourage attention to the elements often overlooked by autocratic tyrannical nationalism (which is the traditional approach of fascism), namely severe social and economic regimentation and protection of the Earth.
(With capital letters not with lower case, which makes us heirs to the Nietzschean desire to be the true guardians of the planet).
That's right, by rejecting nationalism and individualism we become cosmopolitan and authentic earthlings, by embracing a social and economic regime whose main priority is the ecological protection of the environment and the living beings that inhabit it (humans and non-humans but for historical reasons privileging non-humans until the first ones are worthy of the name) we promote the fair distribution of resources against the absurd and suicidal claim of unlimited growth, like a metastatic cancer.
We agree because now it seems to us the most consistent philosophical proposal with our approach, with Deep Ecology. Deep Ecology is an environmental philosophy that promotes the inherent value of all living things, regardless of their instrumental utility for human needs, and the restructuring of modern human societies in accordance with such ideas.
Cursed antecedents such as Savitri Devi, the Unabomber, Garrett Hardin and Pentti Linkola passing through the deconstruction sieve offer valuable help that we will not refuse.
Savitri Devi presented environmentalist views in his works, such as Impeachment of Man (1959), in which she stated her views on animal rights and nature. According to her, human beings are not above animals; according to the ecological view, humans are rather a part of the ecosystem and must respect all life, including animals and all of nature. If we salvage this approach by removing devotion to the Nazi party (since we already reject the notion of a centralized government headed by a dictatorial leader, just like nationalism), it is helpful.
Ted Kaczyński. Between 1978 and 1995, Kaczynski instigated a terrorist bombing campaign intended to incite a revolution against modern industrial society, in the name of returning humanity to a primitive state, suggesting that it offered humanity more freedom while protecting the environment. However, his visionary aspect also clashed squarely with his prejudices: he wrote a manifesto in which he attacked not only modern industrial society, but also "leftists", whom Kaczynski defined as "mainly socialists, collectivists, 'politically correct' types, feminists, homosexual and disabled, animal rights activists and the like". If we de-emphasize the conservative approach and exploit the visionary angle of giving humanity more freedom while protecting the environment, it is helpful. However, we support the use of technology and although Kaczynski denied any political affiliation that does not prevent us from sodomizing him in order to create our own monster (a la Deleuze). For if we contemplate the abyss (and we do) and are fighting against monsters we have to become a greater monster while the abyss is just a peeping tom.
We are with the rejected and we will always support the exploited as long as they do not deserve the condition they have (in the future those who exploit those who cannot defend themselves will be persecuted, tortured and executed unless they radically change their way of life. We are not going to help them).
Garrett Hardin and Pentti Linkola, with the Lifeboat Ethics. The first with affiliations to white supremacy and the second with genocidal and anti-democratic proposals.
We have already firmly rejected racial and speciesist suprematism. The Deep Ecology proposal implies an existential commitment to the well-being of the planet and the harmonious relationship of all living beings. At this point we will be totally Machiavellian.
Both used the following analogy to illustrate their point:
"What to do, when a ship carrying a hundred passengers suddenly capsizes and there is only one lifeboat? When the lifeboat is full, those who hate life will try to load it with more people and sink the boat. Those who love and respect life will take the ship's ax and cut off the extra hands clinging to the sides."
The use of totalitarian and genocidal tactics will be warmly welcomed if the population continues to behave suicidally, blinded by its own selfishness. We hope it won't come down to that, but since we deal with human animals it is better to prepare for the worst (and we refer to History).
Genocide is not genocide when what is eliminated is an invasive species that prevents the ecosystem from prospering by rehabilitating itself from the ravages caused by it. This shouldn't be surprising, we humans do it all the time with other species. It is time to look at ourselves in the mirror and force our eyes before the horrendous, contemplate the beautiful and coldly and equanimously decide what goes and what stays.
A forced sterilization program will be implemented unless the prerogative of one child per family is met. We already have too many humans on the planet and we don't need more to solve the problems we have. If anything, we need fewer and of better quality.
Whoever refuses questions their "freedom" in pursuit of the unspeakable selfishness of begetting by mere whim, without need and without meaning (we have points of agreement with anti-natalism but only until vegan values ​​are naturalized: ie from 200 to 400 years which is approximately the time that a conquest, colonization, destruction and creation of values ​​lasts). We are taking the reference of our own country, which was colonized in a harrowing fashion for 400 years. However with the aid of technology we could short this time to this century, maybe.
Our goal is to wake up from the nightmare of History by making us aware of its form and bringing the authentically new because it is unrepeatable.
The reason we focus on the worst of our kind is very simple. We are surrounded by the worst. Nature did not lack material to make eyesores.
And someone quite enlightened has already said that everything exalted is as difficult as it is rare. (Spinoza)
However, we are also alchemists and if we cannot transform the worst thing we can think and do into something useful for life we ​​are fucked, because that is what is emerging right now and it is a trend that is not going to go away, it has to be re -channeled, redirected, sublimated and deconstructed.
If we can't transmute shit into gold, there's no future we'd want to be a part of, because we're already drowning in shit.

**************************************************************************
Aunque rechazamos frontal y contudentemente el suprematismo blanco, así como cualquier tipo de suprematismo tanto racial como basado en la especie, reconocemos la importancia del pensamiento fascista para ofrecer una solución extrema en tiempos extremos. Quizás sea cierto que los seres humanos puedan solucionar la catástrofe ecológica que ya se cierne sobre nosotros pero también quizá sea cierto y todavía más que probable que el tiempo que tarde nuestra especie para ofrecer soluciones concretas, prácticas y generalizadas para combatir la catástrofe tarde mucho en llegar. A nuestra especie le gusta esperar a lo peor antes de trabajar conjuntamente para una meta en común, aunque sea su propia supervivencia, y aún más la de todos los demás seres vivos en el planeta.
Tal vez sea necesario implementar de manera obligatoria un control natal auspiciado por el gobierno así como una reducción absoluta a todas las subvenciones de productos e industrias basados en la explotación de los animales no humanos por el animal humano. Esto es así porque los pasos para llegar a tan ansiada meta están muy cortos de hacernos avanzar y la ignorancia humana no se deja de reproducir al no dejar de engendrar humanos que ciertamente necesitan educación sobre los valores más básicos como ser vivo en el planeta.
Nustro punto de conexión con la Ecología Profunda está basado en el Veganismo:

"Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals."
Recuperado de www.vegansociety.com/go-vegan/definition-veganism el 31/09/21

Sin embargo, al seguir siendo cierto todavía el recuento de Savitri Devi en Impeachment of Man de que nuestra historia proyecta una indiferencia general hacia el sufrimiento de la vida no-humana, proclamamos nuestra indiferencia hacia el sufrimiento de la vida humana, la propia, la de nuestra familia, nuestros amigos, compatriotas y miembros de la misma especie. Ya que todos somos miembros hasta cierto punto (o lo fuimos) de esta execrable cofradía de abusadores de los demás seres sintientes, y ya que consideramos que a partir de nuestra conversión al veganismo y la ecología profunda vuelven cada vez más insufrible e inaguantable el trato con los humanos ignorantes que sufren de la ignorancia y lavado cerebral por hábitos, valores y tradiciones genocidas y explotacionistas es que firme y llanamente afirmamos que ya no queremos tener nada que ver con esta masa desordenada y desprólija, llena de individuos egoístas e ignorantes. Proclamamos firmemente nuestra falta de solidaridad para con el ser humano hasta que recupere la cordura o la naturaleza siga el curso con nosotros al eliminarnos. Luego, de manera en retrospectiva al ser una especie extinta quizás alguna otra especie dotada de inteligencia, con suerte superior a la humana, nos mire con un dejo de asco y desdén pero decida preservar algunos artefactos históricos meramente por el gusto de anticuario y la nostalgia de formas de vida fallidas.
En caso de que logremos mutar hacia un modo de existencia superior al actual, dentro de la misma forma humana, consideramos con buenos ojos esta posibilidad siempre y cuando nunca olviden las lecciones de la historia y cuánta sangre y sufrimiento han malgastado nuestros antepasados y siguen haciéndolo nuestros contemporáneos.
En suma, apoyamos una campaña profunda y densa de educación para eliminar los valores especistas y antropocéntricos de todas las culturas en el planeta, llegando a su deconstrucción dentro del paradigma del Veganismo y la Ecología Profunda.
En caso de que la campaña falle, apoyaremos entonces una postura Eco-Fascista porque sería la única alternativa cuerda que nos quedaría, al menos para aquellos que todavía respetamos las formas de vida no humanas en el planeta e incluso, las consideramos sagradas. Un gobierno Eco-Fascista implementaría estas reformas por la fuerza bajo amenaza de una exterminación científica de la disidencia retrógrada. Un genocidio no es genocidio cuando se elimina a una especie invasora que impide que el ecosistema prospere al rehabilitarse de los estragos causados por la misma. Es lo contrario, es amar demasiado a la vida como para perder la importancia de uno mismo y nuestros semejantes. Ya que la imperante es una actitud suicida y profundamente injusta, consideramos que el genocidio es una opción, ciertamente la más eficaz para hacer que las ruedas de la historia giren con la suficiente rapidez en caso de encontrarnos en una distopía que lo amerite. Quién sabe, quizás ya estamos ahí.
Es por la horrenda magnitud de nuestras equivocaciones en la Historia que sabemos que estamos en el camino correcto.